
I used to be extremely passionate before I got cancer. I would argue about anything close to my heart. In fact, I once got into a bunch of trouble for telling my boss that the way he wanted to do something was asinine. I still think that, but I would handle things differently now.
For example, I busted my butt on my first project at the new job, and thought that the end result was awesome. However, the customer thought otherwise, and made suggestions that I feel “dumb down” the project. It’s pretty silly, actually.
However, they are the customer, and my response is “whatever they want” - whereas some of the people I work with are ready to argue for what’s already been accomplished.
The bottom line is that there is a time to argue, and there is a time to not. Cancer helps you to re-evaluate what’s important.
This is a common understanding with Sheryl, too. With her experience in the cancer world, she sees, too, what is worth arguing about and what isn’t. Sometimes, I will try to get her to argue with me for the sake of working something out in my head, and she won’t even bite.
Most times, when Sheryl and I disagree about something, one or the other will relent almost immediately. After all, is it really important to win the argument? Is it important to lose?
It all comes out in the wash, and usually, no good comes from heated arguments.
Should I be passionate about this project at work? Yeah, a little, but it’s WAY more important to me to keep this job.
Now before it is suggested that I am simply a candy-ass, let me ask one question:
Does it matter whether I am or not?
Not to me, it’s not.
No comments:
Post a Comment